Русская версия

Search document title:
Content search 1 (fast):
Content search 2:
ENGLISH DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Good Indicators (S6) - B640708-2 | Сравнить
- More Justifications (S3-4) - B640708 | Сравнить

RUSSIAN DOCS FOR THIS DATE- Еще Оправдания (САЕН-3-4) - Б640708 | Сравнить
CONTENTS GOOD INDICATORS R6 GOOD INDICATORS Cохранить документ себе Скачать
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JULY 1964
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 8 JULY, 1964
Issue II
RemimeoRemimeo
FranchiseSthil Students
Sthil StudentsMissions
SCIENTOLOGY III & IVSCIENTOLOGY VI

MORE JUSTIFICATIONS

GOOD INDICATORS

The following list of Scientology Justifications was compiled by Phyll Stevens and several other Course Students and is issued to show how one can get around getting off an overt and stay sick from it.

The following list of good indicators was compiled from my tapes and bulletins and from R6 sessions by a Cl VI (Provisional) and is for use.

L. RON HUBBARD

R6 GOOD INDICATORS

SOME FAMOUS JUSTIFICATIONS

  1. Pc cheerful

It wasn’t really an overt because….

  • Pc cogniting on items and goals
    • It wasn’t me it was just my bank
  • Pc giving items easily and accurately
  • You can’t hurt a thetan
  • Pc understanding items immediately
  • He was asking for a motivator
  • Needle flowing and active. Not stuck, sticky, dirty, springy (reads which bounce back to set position), or tocky (small R/S)
  • He’s got overts on me
  • TA continuing in motion, not stuck
  • I’ve got a service fac on that
  • TA reading higher at the top of each GPM, lower in the lower part of each GPM
  • His overts are bigger than mine
  • TA reading in the range 2.5-3.75 (acceptable) or 2.25-3.0 (excellent)
  • My intentions were good
  • TA action increasing, session by session
  • He’s a victim anyway
  • Items reading on the needle with a smooth fall which hangs at the bottom, as though collapsing
  • I had by-passed charge
  • Items not surging or RRing
  • I was just being self-determined
  • Each item reading with fall of at least 0.2 BD when pc first looks at or says it
  • I’ve come up to being overt
  • Each item being clean or giving further small fall when auditor says it
  • It’s better than suppressing
  • Small fall when pc answers question as to the placement of the item in the GPM
  • I’ll straighten it out next lifetime
  • Small fall when pc asked X step questions*X step: Part of the procedure of R6 Processing at the time of this HCOB.
  • He must have done something to deserve it
  • Heat on items
  • He was dragging it in
  • Heat on placement
  • I was in an ARC break
  • Heat on X steps
  • He needed a lesson
  • No pain on items
  • He’ll have another lifetime anyway
  • Pc not seeing pictures
  • It’s only a consideration anyhow
  • Pc with no question as to the correctness of Line Plot, Root Plot or Series Plot
  • It’s not against my moral code
  • Pc with no PTP about whether goals and items run in earlier sessions were fully discharged
  • Codes are only considerations
  • Pc not interested in goals or items already run
  • They couldn’t have it
  • Pc not critical or ARC breaky
  • They weren’t willing to experience it
  • Pc not protesting auditor’s actions
  • I don’t see why I have to be the only one to take responsibility
  • Pc being responsible for auditing. Keeping auditor informed of what is happening and not letting auditor make mistakes
  • It’s about time I was overt
  • Pc looking younger by reason of R6 auditing
  • They are only wogs anyhow
  • Pc without weariness
  • They are so way out they wouldn’t realize it
  • Pc without pains, aches, illnesses or heavy PTPs developing during auditing, in or between sessions
  • He’s such a victim already, one more motivator won’t make any difference
  • Pc wanting more auditing
  • They just can’t have 8-C
  • Pc’s confidence in as-ising items getting progressively better
  • I can’t help it if he reacts
  • Pc’s perception and understanding of GPMs getting progressively better
  • He’s too critical
  • Pc’s itsa free but not so extensive as to halt session progress, usually about 15 seconds to itsa an item
  • He must have missed W/Hs
  • Pc’s cognitions making sense to auditor
  • Why should I limit my causativeness just because others can’t take it
  • Auditor seeing how pc’s cognitions explain pc’s case and behavior
  • It was my duty to tell the truth
  • L. RON HUBBARD
    Founder
  • He must have postulated it first
  • LRH:nb
  • He never would have cognited if I hadn’t told him
  • I’ll run it out later
  • He’ll be getting more auditing
  • LRH:nb.rd